Rep Femi Gbajabiamila |
ABUJA-Lawyers have dragged Rep. Femi
Gbajabiamila before an Abuja federal high court asking the court to disqualify
him from holding any public office in Nigeria.
In an originating summon filed before Abuja Federal High court
yesterday by Registered Trustees of Social Justice and Civil Rights Awareness
Initiative, the lawyers are seeking for an order of the court declaring
Gbajabiamila not fit and proper person to be elected member of the House of
Representatives.
The suit was entered by Chukwuma Nwachukwu Esq and Osita K.
Nwaikpo Esq of Law Bond Solicitors Abuja, asking the court to restrain the
House of Representatives and the Attorney General of the Federation from
accepting nomination of the first defendant (Gbajabiamila) for office of
speaker of the House.
In an affidavit in support of the originating summons, the
lawyers have recently discovered that Gbajabiamila was convicted in United
States of America in the state of Goergia for unethical practices and was
debarred for 36 months on 26 February, 2007 by the Supreme Court of state of
Georgia.
And that they have also discovered that Gbajabiamila has a
United States international passport even though he has Nigerian descent which
contravened the constitution as regards membership of the House of
Representatives
“The mood of the nation today will not warrant placing the
position of speaker of the House of Representatives in the hands of any
individual with tainted character by possessing American passport as a citizen
which supposes that Hon. Femi Gbajabiamila has pledged his allegiance to
another country contrary to the provision of section 66(1) (a) of the
constitution which provides thus:
“No person shall be qualified for election to the senate or the
House of Representatives if (a) subject to the provisions of section 28 of this
constitution, he has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a country other
than Nigeria or except, in such cases as may be prescribed by the National
Assembly, has made declaration of allegiance to such a country.
He was
convicted of theft of his client`s funds in the year 2007, which contravenes
section 66 of the constitution and “is clear on the time lapse before anyone
convicted of a criminal offense bothering on dishonesty could contest election
again within a period of less than 10 years before the date of an election to a
legislative house.”
No comments:
Post a Comment